Profile picture of Stephane Hamel
Stephane Hamel
Digital marketing & analytics shaped by data governance, privacy and ethics | Educator · Speaker · Consultant
Follow me
Generated by linktime
April 15, 2024
Interesting initiative by Martine Peters, researcher and professor in educational science and director of the University partnership on plagiarism prevention at the Université du Québec en Outaouais (too bad she's not on LinkedIn!) The basic idea seems interesting, but for the moment, I have several questions: • The definition of each of these categories remains very suggestive. For example, office software and grammar correction tools now include the use of AI to facilitate writing, correct or reformulate. So should we always consider it AIA? • At what point is something considered GIA? As soon as it's used, 20%, 50%, 80%? To improve upon the original idea, I would suggest: • Simplify the logos to be more like Creative Commons - for example, a simple circle with a brain or gears logo. • Use colors: green=NIA (organic/natural/human), blue=GIA (human-IA harmony), gray/metallic=AIA • But above all, always accompany GIA and AIA with an APA-inspired statement that would include the name of the prompt engineer; the date; a simplified version of the prompt or minimally, the topic or purpose; the tool which was used; and if available, a permanent URL associated with the interaction. Source: https://lnkd.in/gsDxWFyy /cc Nadia Naffi Ph.D.
Stay updated
Subscribe to receive my future LinkedIn posts in your mailbox.

By clicking "Subscribe", you agree to receive emails from linktime.co.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

April 15, 2024